Galaxy F16
Samsung · Jun 2025
₹12,499
39 / 100 spec score
Higher overall- Home
- Smartphones
- Galaxy F16 vs vivo Y28e
Galaxy F16 vs vivo Y28e
Galaxy F16 scores higher overall and wins 2 of 6 areas, but vivo Y28e still wins 1.
vivo Y28e
vivo · Jul 2024
₹10,499
27 / 100 spec score
Area by area
Galaxy F16vivo Y28e
Display
Performancevivo Y28e leads
Cameras
BatteryGalaxy F16 leads
PortabilityGalaxy F16 leads
Longevity
Why pick Galaxy F16
- Storage (base): 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Storage (max): 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Thickness: 7.9 mm vs 8.4 mm
Why pick vivo Y28e
- Weight: 185 g vs 191 g
Tiebreaker
What matters to you?
Set how much each area matters. The verdict updates instantly and stays on your device.
Your pick
Galaxy F16
Scores 42 vs 31 on your weighting.
- Galaxy F1642
- vivo Y28e31
If Performance mattered a bit more to you, vivo Y28e would draw level.
Full specifications
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.70 in | 6.56 in |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| Top CPU clock | 2.40 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| RAM (max) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | — | 13 MP |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 191 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Galaxy F16 | vivo Y28e | |
|---|---|---|
| Launched with | Android 14.0 | Funtouch OS 14 (Based on Android 14) |
Green marks the better value where “better” is clear. Specs from each maker’s published pages.