NEXTRIX.
  1. Home
  2. Processors
  3. Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 265K

Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 265K

Core Ultra 7 155H scores higher overall and wins 1 of 5 areas, but Core Ultra 7 265K still wins 4.

Area by area

Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 7 265K
Multi-core potentialCore Ultra 7 265K leads6269
Single-core potentialCore Ultra 7 265K leads5678
CacheCore Ultra 7 265K leads1318
EfficiencyCore Ultra 7 155H leads9229
AI accelerationCore Ultra 7 265K leads2226

Why pick Core Ultra 7 155H

  • Base power (TDP): 28 W vs 125 W
  • Threads: 22 vs 20

16 cores

Why pick Core Ultra 7 265K

  • Base clock: 3.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
  • Cores: 20 vs 16
  • L3 / shared cache: 30 MB vs 24 MB
  • NPU: 13 TOPS vs 11 TOPS

20 cores

Tiebreaker

What matters to you?

Set how much each area matters. The verdict updates instantly and stays on your device.

Your pick

Core Ultra 7 155H

Scores 49 vs 44 on your weighting.

  1. Core Ultra 7 155H49
  2. Core Ultra 7 265K44

If Efficiency mattered less to you, Core Ultra 7 265K would draw level.

Full specifications

Overview
Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 7 265K
SegmentLaptopDesktop
ArchitectureMeteor LakeArrow Lake-S
SocketBGALGA 1851
ProcessIntel 4TSMC N3B
Cores & clocks
Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 7 265K
Cores1620
Threads2220
Core layout6 P-cores + 8 E-cores + 2 LP E-cores8 P-cores + 12 E-cores
Base clock1.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Max boost4.8 GHz5.5 GHz
Cache & memory
Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 7 265K
L3 / shared cache24 MB30 MB
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / LPDDR5X-7467DDR5-6400
Power & graphics
Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 7 265K
Base power (TDP)28 W125 W
Integrated graphicsIntel Arc (8 Xe cores)Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores)
NPU11 TOPS13 TOPS

Green marks the better value where “better” is clear. Specs from each maker’s published pages.