Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel · Dec 2023
Price not listed
49 / 100 spec score
- Home
- Processors
- Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K scores higher overall and wins 4 of 5 areas, but Core Ultra 7 155H still wins 1.
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel · Oct 2024
Price not listed
50 / 100 spec score
Higher overallArea by area
Core Ultra 7 155HCore Ultra 9 285K
Multi-core potentialCore Ultra 9 285K leads
Single-core potentialCore Ultra 9 285K leads
CacheCore Ultra 9 285K leads
EfficiencyCore Ultra 7 155H leads
AI accelerationCore Ultra 9 285K leads
Why pick Core Ultra 7 155H
- Base power (TDP): 28 W vs 125 W
16 cores
Why pick Core Ultra 9 285K
- Base clock: 3.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Cores: 24 vs 16
- L3 / shared cache: 36 MB vs 24 MB
- Max boost: 5.7 GHz vs 4.8 GHz
24 cores
Tiebreaker
What matters to you?
Set how much each area matters. The verdict updates instantly and stays on your device.
Your pick
Core Ultra 9 285K
Too close to call on your priorities.
- Core Ultra 9 285K50
- Core Ultra 7 155H49
If Efficiency mattered a bit more to you, Core Ultra 7 155H would draw level.
Full specifications
| Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake | Arrow Lake-S |
| Socket | BGA | LGA 1851 |
| Process | Intel 4 | TSMC N3B |
| Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 24 |
| Threads | 22 | 24 |
| Core layout | 6 P-cores + 8 E-cores + 2 LP E-cores | 8 P-cores + 16 E-cores |
| Base clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max boost | 4.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| L3 / shared cache | 24 MB | 36 MB |
| Memory support | DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5X-7467 | DDR5-6400 |
| Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base power (TDP) | 28 W | 125 W |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Arc (8 Xe cores) | Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores) |
| NPU | 11 TOPS | 13 TOPS |
Green marks the better value where “better” is clear. Specs from each maker’s published pages.