1. Home
  2. Smartphones
  3. Galaxy Z Fold7 vs vivo X300 Ultra

Galaxy Z Fold7 vs vivo X300 Ultra

Galaxy Z Fold7 has too few published specs for an overall score; Galaxy Z Fold7 wins 0 and vivo X300 Ultra wins 3 of the areas both can be scored on.

Area by area

Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Display—100
Performancevivo X300 Ultra leads59100
Camerasvivo X300 Ultra leads68100
Batteryvivo X300 Ultra leads4094
Portability—23
Longevity——

Why pick Galaxy Z Fold7

No clear spec advantages.

Why pick vivo X300 Ultra

  • Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • Storage (base): 512 GB vs 256 GB
  • Battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Two 200 MP rear cameras including the telephoto

Tiebreaker

What matters to you?

Set how much each area matters. The verdict updates instantly and stays on your device.

Your pick

vivo X300 Ultra

Scores 78 vs 53 on your weighting.

  1. vivo X300 Ultra78
  2. Galaxy Z Fold753

If Portability mattered a bit more to you, Galaxy Z Fold7 would draw level.

Full specifications

Display
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Size8.00 in6.82 in
Panel—AMOLED
Resolution—3168 × 1440
Refresh rate—144 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Performance
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Process—3 nm
Top CPU clock—4.60 GHz
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Memory card slot—No
Cameras
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Front camera10 MP50 MP
Battery & charging
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Battery4,400 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired charging—100 W
Design
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness—8.2 mm
Water resistance—IP68 & IP69
Build—Glass back
Software & connectivity
Galaxy Z Fold7vivo X300 Ultra
Launched withAndroid 16.0OriginOS 6 (Android 16)
5G—Yes
3.5 mm jack—No

Green marks the better value where “better” is clear. Specs from each maker’s published pages.